A SharePoint migration tool is software designed to move SharePoint content, sites, libraries, lists, permissions, metadata, versions, and related structures from one environment to another. Depending on the product, that environment may be SharePoint Server, SharePoint Online, another Microsoft 365 tenant, a file server, Google Workspace, or another cloud platform. The reason organizations need specialized migration software is simple: copying files is easy, but preserving the relationships around those files is much harder. A business document may have version history, unique permissions, metadata, links, ownership information, and a location inside a complicated site hierarchy. A successful migration therefore needs to move more than the visible files. Microsoft's own SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) supports SharePoint Server and file-share scenarios, including files, folders, list items, permissions, versions, managed metadata, taxonomy, navigation, and other supported features. Microsoft also states that SPMT does not perform a direct Microsoft 365 tenant-to-tenant SharePoint migration.

The right tool depends heavily on the migration scenario. A small organization moving a few file shares into Microsoft 365 may not need the same platform as an enterprise consolidating hundreds of SharePoint sites after an acquisition. Similarly, an administrator moving SharePoint 2016 or 2019 to SharePoint Online has different requirements from a company moving content between two Microsoft 365 tenants. In 2026, migration products increasingly focus on discovery, identity mapping, incremental migration, reporting, automation, and validation rather than simply copying documents. Microsoft currently documents a 250 GB maximum file size for SPMT SharePoint Server-to-Microsoft 365 and file-share-to-Microsoft 365 scenarios, although actual project limitations can also depend on the migration path and configuration.

How We Compared SharePoint Migration Tools in 2026

Choosing the tools for a comparison like this requires looking beyond marketing claims. A migration application can have an impressive feature list but still be unsuitable for a particular SharePoint environment because the source version, destination, permissions model, authentication method, data volume, or workload is different. For this 2026 comparison, the major factors considered are supported SharePoint versions, SharePoint Online support, tenant-to-tenant capabilities, content fidelity, permissions, metadata, version history, filtering, incremental migration, scheduling, concurrent processing, reporting, automation, and ease of use. Current vendor documentation and Microsoft documentation were checked rather than relying only on older product descriptions.

Another important factor is whether the tool is designed primarily for SharePoint or whether SharePoint is one workload inside a broader Microsoft 365 migration platform. For example, AvePoint Fly supports SharePoint alongside OneDrive, Exchange, Teams, Groups, and other workloads, while ShareGate has expanded its migration capabilities across Microsoft 365 workloads. Quest Content Matrix remains particularly focused on complex SharePoint and file-share migrations, whereas Shoviv supports SharePoint Online and on-premises SharePoint with additional cloud targets.

The list below is therefore best understood as a 2026 comparison guide rather than a universal ranking. Your migration scenario should determine which capabilities matter most.

Top 10 SharePoint Migration Tools for 2026

The SharePoint migration market includes native Microsoft utilities, enterprise migration suites, cloud migration platforms, and Windows-based migration applications. The ten products covered here are Microsoft SharePoint Migration Tool, ShareGate Migrate, AvePoint Fly, Quest Metalogix Content Matrix, BitTitan MigrationWiz, Cloudiway, Shoviv SharePoint Migration Tool, SysTools SharePoint Migration Tool, CloudFuze, and CloudM. Each approaches migration differently, so the most useful way to compare them is to understand the scenarios each product is designed to handle.

A major difference is the balance between control and simplicity. Native Microsoft tools can be attractive when the migration follows Microsoft's supported paths and the IT team is comfortable working with Microsoft's ecosystem. Enterprise products can provide broader assessment, mapping, reporting, automation, and support capabilities. Dedicated SharePoint migration applications can be useful when an organization needs granular filtering, multiple concurrent jobs, or broader source-and-target combinations. Current product documentation confirms that several vendors now support cross-tenant migrations and advanced mapping, while Microsoft itself continues to distinguish native SharePoint Server-to-Microsoft 365 migration from Microsoft 365 tenant-to-tenant migration.

1. Shoviv SharePoint Migration Tool

Shoviv SharePoint Migration Tool is a Windows-based migration application designed for SharePoint Online and on-premises SharePoint environments. Shoviv states that the tool supports migration between SharePoint versions and can migrate sites, site collections, Teams sites, Microsoft 365 Group sites, document libraries, lists, permissions, file versions, sites, and subsites. It also supports migration from SharePoint to destinations such as OneDrive, Google Drive, and Google Shared Drive in supported scenarios.

Website: https://www.shoviv.com/sharepoint-migrator.html

One of its notable features is job-based migration with concurrent processing. Administrators can add multiple sites, create multiple jobs, schedule jobs, and run jobs concurrently. The software also provides filters based on date, file size, file extension, library, and subsite, allowing administrators to avoid transferring unnecessary content. Its incremental export capability is designed to resume migration and reduce duplication, while file conflict options include skipping, replacing, creating, or renaming files.

Shoviv's current product information lists version 26.7, 32-bit and 64-bit architecture support, and a demo allowing 500 MB per site with files under 20 MB. Its commercial licensing page currently lists site-based options, including 5, 10, 20, 50, and 80+ site packages, with the displayed 20-site package priced at $595 at the time checked. Organizations should verify current pricing and trial conditions before purchasing because licensing can change.

2. Microsoft SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT)

Microsoft SharePoint Migration Tool is the native Microsoft option and is an important starting point for organizations moving supported on-premises SharePoint Server environments or file shares into Microsoft 365. Microsoft documents support for SharePoint Server 2010, 2013, 2016, and 2019, along with local and network file shares. Supported migration elements include files, folders, list items, permissions, versions, managed metadata and taxonomy, navigation, and various site features. Microsoft also documents a 250 GB maximum file size for SharePoint Server-to-Microsoft 365 and file-share-to-Microsoft 365 SPMT scenarios.

The major limitation becomes apparent when the project moves beyond a straightforward supported path. Microsoft explicitly states that SPMT cannot migrate content directly from one SharePoint Online tenant to another. Its FAQ also explains that organizations handling large amounts of data can install SPMT on multiple physical or virtual Windows machines and run migration jobs in parallel, while Migration Manager can be used for more automated throughput orchestration. Microsoft additionally lists unsupported SharePoint Server migration elements such as structure-only migration, master pages, InfoPath forms, and custom New/Edit/View forms.

For organizations already heavily invested in Microsoft 365 and performing a conventional on-premises-to-cloud migration, SPMT can therefore be a logical first option to evaluate. It is particularly relevant when the migration fits Microsoft's documented source and destination combinations. However, companies dealing with tenant-to-tenant migration, complex restructuring, granular third-party integrations, broad filtering requirements, or multiple heterogeneous platforms may need to evaluate commercial alternatives.

3. ShareGate Migrate

ShareGate Migrate is a broad Microsoft 365 migration platform aimed at organizations that need more than basic content transfer. Its current 2026 release cycle shows continuing development around SharePoint, Teams, OneDrive, identities, mailboxes, PowerShell automation, sensitivity labels, and migration planning. For example, ShareGate's September 2026 release notes document support improvements for SharePoint Online copies, Teams, OneNote, identity mapping, and other migration scenarios. Its July 2026 release added PowerShell support for mapping sensitivity labels between SharePoint Online tenants.

One notable 2026 addition is Migration Projects, introduced in ShareGate's workspace for pre-migration discovery and planning. The feature is designed to assess the source Microsoft 365 tenant, estimate migration scope, identify potential blockers, and identify data that might be excluded, archived, or cleaned before migration. This reflects a wider industry shift: migration projects increasingly begin with discovery and assessment rather than immediately copying data.

ShareGate is particularly relevant when the project extends beyond simple SharePoint document migration. Its current release history covers identity mapping, Microsoft 365 groups, Teams, mailboxes, PowerShell, sensitivity labels, and other workloads. Administrators should still review the specific feature support for their exact source and destination combination before selecting it, because SharePoint migrations can contain legacy web parts, custom fields, term stores, unique permissions, and other elements that behave differently depending on the environment.

4. AvePoint Fly

AvePoint Fly is an enterprise-oriented migration platform supporting SharePoint, OneDrive, Exchange, Teams, Microsoft 365 Groups, Active Directory/Entra ID scenarios, and other workloads. AvePoint documents support for SharePoint Server 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019, and Subscription Edition, as well as SharePoint Online. Its SharePoint capabilities include migration of site collections, sites, lists, libraries, files, folders, and configurations, while its broader migration platform supports tenant-to-tenant projects across multiple Microsoft 365 workloads.

A major focus is discovery and migration management. AvePoint describes a free pre-migration discovery process that can examine information architecture, data size, users, activity, and customizations. The platform also provides real-time dashboards, migration reports, error reporting, validation, filtering, scheduling, and mapping. AvePoint states that its migration approach can preserve permissions, versions, sensitivity labels, metadata, and other information depending on the scenario.

Fly is therefore worth considering for organizations where SharePoint is part of a larger Microsoft 365 transformation. Its enterprise focus can be especially relevant to mergers, acquisitions, tenant consolidation, restructuring, and multi-workload migration programs. At the same time, administrators should check individual workload support lists before committing to a migration plan. AvePoint's documentation, for example, identifies certain unsupported SharePoint Online elements and limitations around retention labels and Information Rights Management in particular migration scenarios.

5. Quest Metalogix Content Matrix

Quest Metalogix Content Matrix has a long-standing focus on SharePoint migration, consolidation, restructuring, and content movement. Quest describes Content Matrix as a solution for migrating SharePoint content and file shares into newer SharePoint environments or Microsoft 365. It supports migration between SharePoint versions and can be used for restructuring and reorganizing content instead of simply performing a one-to-one copy.

One of its distinguishing characteristics is its emphasis on enterprise SharePoint environments and distributed migration. Quest describes the ability to distribute workloads across multiple machines and run migrations simultaneously. The product also supports incremental migration, metadata migration, permissions, information architecture changes, Nintex forms and workflows, and restructuring activities. Quest presents Content Matrix as suitable for projects where organizations need to move older SharePoint environments without performing a sequence of intermediate upgrades.

Content Matrix can be especially relevant when the source environment is complicated or heavily customized. Its documentation covers SharePoint-to-SharePoint migration and specifies supported source and target versions, while its installation documentation describes components designed to improve migration speed and fidelity. Organizations considering it should still map their exact SharePoint versions, customizations, forms, workflows, and third-party applications before migration because these details can affect the migration path.

6. BitTitan MigrationWiz

BitTitan MigrationWiz is a cloud-based migration platform used for several migration scenarios, including SharePoint Online document library migrations. BitTitan's current 2026 documentation describes SharePoint Online-to-SharePoint Online document library migrations, including scenarios involving Microsoft 365 Groups and file shares. Its documentation makes an important distinction: MigrationWiz is a migration tool rather than a continuous synchronization tool, and its SharePoint migration workflow does not provide live monitoring of changes in the same way a synchronization agent would.

MigrationWiz is also relevant for migrations involving file servers and cloud storage. BitTitan documents file-server-to-SharePoint Online migrations involving folder structures, files, and permissions. Its Google Shared Drives-to-SharePoint Online documentation also demonstrates support for cross-platform migration scenarios, although particular prerequisites and limitations apply.

The licensing and endpoint model needs careful attention. BitTitan documents different license types for different migration scenarios, and its SharePoint Online endpoint documentation says the maximum file size varies by migration type but cannot exceed 60 GB for that endpoint. That makes it particularly important to test representative files and workloads before committing to a large migration. For organizations already using MigrationWiz for broader Microsoft 365 migration work, its SharePoint capabilities can fit naturally into a larger migration program.

7. Cloudiway

Cloudiway focuses on cloud migration and Microsoft 365 transformation scenarios, including SharePoint site migration. Its SharePoint migration solution supports migrations involving SharePoint Online and on-premises SharePoint, including site collections, subsites, document libraries, lists, files, metadata, and permissions. Cloudiway also emphasizes mergers, acquisitions, tenant consolidation, and organizational restructuring as important SharePoint migration use cases.

The platform places considerable emphasis on discovery, auditing, mapping, migration, and reporting. Cloudiway describes a process that begins with identifying sites and subsites, analyzing data volume and complexity, moving content, and applying user and group mappings. Its documentation states that classic and modern SharePoint sites, including Team Sites and Communication Sites, can be migrated in supported scenarios.

Cloudiway can therefore be useful when a SharePoint migration is part of a broader cloud transformation project rather than a simple site copy. The key consideration is to validate the exact content types and configurations required by the organization. Migration documentation explains that site structure and many metadata elements can be transferred, but the precise set of migrated elements can vary according to the source platform and scenario.

8. SysTools SharePoint Migration Tool

SysTools SharePoint Migration Tool is another dedicated migration application aimed at moving SharePoint sites, lists, libraries, and associated data. Its current product documentation describes SharePoint site-to-site and tenant migration scenarios, batch migration, date-range filtering, source-to-destination user mapping, migration dashboards, stopping migration jobs, and delta migration for newly arrived data.

The product can be relevant when an administrator wants a more guided interface for SharePoint-to-SharePoint migration rather than building a migration process from individual scripts. Its documented workflow involves selecting the source and destination Microsoft 365 environments, selecting sites, validating credentials, and starting the migration. The vendor also describes batch processing and interactive monitoring, which can be useful when several sites need to be transferred as part of one project.

As with every migration product, feature compatibility should be tested against the actual environment. A site containing custom forms, complex permissions, legacy components, third-party web parts, or unusual metadata can behave differently from a standard modern SharePoint site. A pilot migration using representative sites is therefore more useful than relying only on a feature checklist.

9. CloudFuze

CloudFuze is a cloud migration platform that supports SharePoint-to-SharePoint and SharePoint-to-Microsoft 365 migration scenarios. Its current documentation describes migrations involving sites, libraries, users, permissions, metadata, and other content, with options for custom user mapping through CSV files. CloudFuze also describes automated handling of certain SharePoint naming and path restrictions, migration scheduling, reporting, and validation.

One of the more useful aspects of CloudFuze for complex tenant projects is its focus on user mapping and delta migration. Its documentation describes auto mapping and CSV-based mapping, along with one-time and delta migration options. A phased approach can be useful when organizations need to keep the source environment active while batches are moved and validated. CloudFuze also documents migration support for SharePoint 2019 to SharePoint Online and notes that SharePoint 2019 reached end of support on July 14, 2026.

CloudFuze is consequently relevant for organizations managing large cloud migrations, especially where SharePoint is being consolidated or moved between environments. The platform also offers migration services alongside the software, which can matter when an internal IT team does not want to manage every migration phase itself.

10. CloudM Migrate

CloudM Migrate is a broader migration platform supporting Microsoft 365 and other cloud ecosystems. Its SharePoint-related documentation describes use of the SharePoint Migration API for migration scenarios involving Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Box, Dropbox, file systems, another Microsoft 365 instance, Google Cloud Storage, and Azure Storage.

CloudM's documentation also covers Microsoft 365-to-Microsoft 365 migration batches and SharePoint Sites-to-Google Workspace Shared Drives scenarios. This makes the platform relevant for organizations that are not simply moving from one SharePoint Server version to another but are working across different cloud ecosystems. Its migration architecture includes configurable source and destination connections, batch configurations, retry settings, permissions options, and SharePoint Migration API settings.

The main consideration is that CloudM is broader than a SharePoint-only product. That can be helpful when a migration involves multiple platforms, but administrators should examine the exact SharePoint features supported for the selected source and destination. As with the other tools in this list, a controlled pilot is the safest way to confirm that permissions, metadata, versions, links, and other business-critical elements behave as expected.

SharePoint Migration Tools Comparison Table

The following table summarizes the major capabilities documented for these tools. Because migration support varies by source, destination, license, and workload, a Yes in a general capability column should not be interpreted as a guarantee for every migration scenario.

Microsoft's own documentation confirms that SPMT is aimed at supported on-premises and file-share migration paths and does not directly perform Microsoft 365 tenant-to-tenant SharePoint migration. Vendor documentation also confirms broader tenant-to-tenant, incremental, mapping, reporting, and automation capabilities across several commercial platforms, although exact support depends on the workload.

How to Choose the Right SharePoint Migration Tool

The first question should not be "Which SharePoint migration tool is the best?" A better question is "Which tool supports my exact migration path with the least amount of manual work?" Start by identifying the source and destination. Is the source SharePoint 2016, SharePoint 2019, SharePoint Server Subscription Edition, SharePoint Online, a file server, Google Drive, or another Microsoft 365 tenant? Then identify the destination. A tool that is excellent for SharePoint Server-to-SharePoint Online may not be the right choice for tenant-to-tenant migration. Microsoft's SPMT documentation makes this distinction particularly clear because SPMT supports SharePoint Server-to-Microsoft 365 migration but not direct tenant-to-tenant SharePoint migration.

Next, examine the data rather than simply counting gigabytes. Two migrations containing 2 TB each can be completely different projects. One may contain simple documents with standard permissions, while another may contain thousands of sites, unique permissions, version histories, custom metadata, managed terms, legacy web parts, workflows, and complex site structures. The second project needs stronger discovery, mapping, filtering, reporting, and validation capabilities. A good migration tool should help you answer practical questions before migration begins: What should move? What should stay? Which users need mapping? Which files are problematic? Which sites contain unsupported components?

Finally, consider operational requirements. If you need to run multiple migration jobs simultaneously, look for concurrent processing. If the source remains active during the project, look for incremental or delta migration. If the migration is being performed outside business hours, look for scheduling. If management needs evidence of what moved, look for detailed reports and validation. Tools such as Shoviv, ShareGate, AvePoint, Quest, Cloudiway, CloudFuze, and others document combinations of these capabilities, but the correct choice depends on which requirements are essential to your project.

SharePoint Migration Checklist for 2026

A successful SharePoint migration starts before the migration software is installed. Begin with discovery: inventory sites, site collections, subsites, libraries, lists, users, groups, permissions, file counts, file sizes, versions, customizations, and integrations. Identify inactive or redundant content before moving it because migration is a poor time to carry years of unnecessary data into a new environment. Microsoft and third-party migration vendors increasingly emphasize assessment and discovery because the technical transfer itself is only one part of the project. ShareGate's 2026 Migration Projects feature, for example, is specifically designed to help organizations understand source-tenant size, blockers, and content that may be excluded or archived before migration.

Then build a pilot. Select representative sites rather than the easiest sites you can find. Include at least one site with permissions, metadata, version history, large files, custom content, and the types of documents users actually depend on. Compare the source and destination after migration, including file counts, folder structures, permissions, versions, links, metadata, and user access. If the pilot exposes problems, correct the mapping or migration settings before the main project begins. This is much safer than discovering after a weekend cutover that hundreds of users cannot access a critical library.

The final phase should include incremental migration, validation, and user readiness where required. If users continue working in the source during the migration, determine how newly changed content will be transferred. Delta or incremental capabilities can reduce the amount of data that needs to be moved during final cutover, although the exact implementation differs between products. Tools such as Shoviv, CloudFuze, ShareGate, Quest, and other platforms document incremental or delta-oriented capabilities for supported scenarios.

Native Microsoft Tool vs. Third-Party SharePoint Migration Software

The choice between Microsoft's native tooling and third-party software is primarily about migration scope and complexity, not simply about whether one category is "better." SPMT is deeply integrated with Microsoft 365 and is designed for supported migrations such as SharePoint Server and file shares into Microsoft 365. If that is exactly what you need, a native Microsoft tool can be an appropriate place to start. Microsoft also provides Migration Manager and other services for broader Microsoft 365 migration scenarios.

Third-party tools become more relevant when the migration requires capabilities outside a straightforward native path. Tenant-to-tenant migration is an obvious example because Microsoft explicitly states that SPMT does not migrate content directly from one Microsoft 365 tenant to another. Advanced user mapping, multiple concurrent jobs, granular filtering, cross-platform migration, detailed dashboards, migration scheduling, and specialized restructuring can also make third-party products worth evaluating. ShareGate, AvePoint, Quest, Cloudiway, Shoviv, CloudFuze, BitTitan, SysTools, and CloudM all document capabilities beyond the narrowest SPMT use case, although their supported combinations differ.

The practical approach is to create a requirements matrix before purchasing anything. Put your source, destination, data volume, number of sites, permissions, versions, metadata, filtering needs, identity mapping, scheduling, incremental migration, reporting, and support requirements into one document. Then test two or three tools against the same representative sample. The results of that pilot will usually tell you more than a long list of product features.

Conclusion

SharePoint migration in 2026 is no longer just a matter of copying documents from one location to another. Modern SharePoint environments contain permissions, metadata, version history, site structures, identities, Teams connections, Microsoft 365 Groups, links, and business processes that can make migration surprisingly complex. The Microsoft SharePoint Migration Tool remains an important native option for supported SharePoint Server and file-share migration paths, while products such as ShareGate, AvePoint Fly, Quest Metalogix Content Matrix, BitTitan MigrationWiz, Cloudiway, Shoviv, SysTools, CloudFuze, and CloudM provide different combinations of migration, mapping, filtering, automation, reporting, and cross-platform capabilities.

The most suitable choice depends on the project rather than the name on the product. For a conventional on-premises-to-Microsoft 365 migration, native Microsoft tooling may cover the required path. For tenant consolidation, restructuring, large-scale projects, complex mapping, or cross-platform migrations, a dedicated migration platform may provide capabilities that reduce manual work. Before making the final selection, test the tool with real data and verify permissions, metadata, versions, links, file sizes, unsupported components, identity mappings, and reporting.

A carefully planned pilot is the bridge between a promising migration tool and a successful production migration. Treat the migration as a controlled project with discovery, preparation, testing, execution, validation, and post-migration checks. That approach matters just as much as the software you choose.

Frequently Asked Questions:-

1. What is the best SharePoint migration tool in 2026?

There is no single tool that fits every SharePoint migration. Microsoft SPMT is designed for supported migrations such as SharePoint Server and file shares to Microsoft 365, while commercial platforms such as ShareGate, AvePoint, Quest, Cloudiway, Shoviv, CloudFuze, BitTitan, SysTools, and CloudM address different combinations of SharePoint, Microsoft 365, cloud, and tenant migration scenarios. The right selection should be based on the source, destination, data complexity, permissions, versions, filtering, and automation requirements.

2. Can SharePoint Migration Tool migrate from one Microsoft 365 tenant to another?

No. Microsoft's current SPMT FAQ explicitly states that SPMT cannot migrate content from one SharePoint Online tenant to another. Microsoft points users toward cross-tenant migration solutions for SharePoint and OneDrive for those scenarios.

3. What should I check before choosing a SharePoint migration tool?

Check the source and destination platforms first. Then examine support for permissions, metadata, version history, site collections, subsites, lists, libraries, custom content, identity mapping, filtering, incremental migration, scheduling, reporting, and large files. A test migration using representative data is strongly recommended before the production move.

4. Can SharePoint migration tools preserve permissions and metadata?

Many commercial migration tools support permissions and metadata preservation, but the exact level of fidelity varies by source, destination, and workload. Microsoft documents support for permissions, versions, managed metadata, taxonomy, and navigation in supported SPMT scenarios, while vendors such as AvePoint, Quest, Cloudiway, Shoviv, and CloudFuze document additional permission and metadata capabilities for their supported migration paths.

5. Should I migrate everything to the new SharePoint environment?

Not necessarily. Migration is a good opportunity to identify obsolete, duplicate, inactive, or unnecessary content before transferring it. A pre-migration assessment can help determine what should be migrated, archived, reorganized, or excluded. ShareGate's current migration-planning functionality, for example, specifically addresses identifying content that may be excluded, archived, or cleaned before migration.